You know what I really fucking hate about literate consumers who are appraising something they don’t like?
The use of the ‘Original Stick’. The Original Stick is the first weapon to come to hand when wishing to beat up on a cultural artefact. You apply it to said item by saying: “Oh and it’s so derivative of x and y and z”.
Well, fucking duh!
Some sensible person always pipes up that nothing’s really original any more, but our cliche detectors remove the comment and the artefact bashing continues. The fact that sensible person is right, that nothing is original and hasn’t been for many, many centuries is deemed irrelevant.
The thing is that saying something you don’t like is ‘unoriginal’ is a bit like saying something you do like is ‘entertaining’. It’s a safe term to apply to signify your distate for it because it could safely be said to apply to just about every cultural artefact ever.
This particular observation has been kicked off by this rumour:
Sophia Stewart won a large judgement in a copyright infringement suit over authorship of the film The Matrix.
Here expertly debunked by Snopes, in which it is claimed that Ms Stewart once wrote a story so similar to the plotlines of the Matrix Trilogy and Terminators One and Two that she won mega bucks and those hacks Wachowski (elder and younger) and Cameron should weep for shame at abusing some poor innocent struggling writer. Great story, all bullshit. Her only innovation was in pointing out that the first two Terminator movies and the Matrix Trilogy kind of dovetail into almost one narrative.
And all this was prompted by a discussion I engaged in which was supposedly about the prurient allegations of sexual perversion practiced by Wachowski the Elder (Larry) which is allegedly making him into a Hollywood pariah (in which case surely his sin would be more likely in not covering up his perversions not in having them in the first place). What this has to do with whether the Wachowskis will ever live up or down to the reputation garnered them as makers of the Matrix Trilogy, is anybody’s guess. It was disheartening as ever to see the conversation evolve thus:
1) Larry Wachowski is kinkier than a tangled hosepipe.
2) And the Wachowskis are going to screw V for Vendetta, they, and their stupid fucking Matrix trilogy suck.
3) The Matrix wasn’t even particularly original.
4) Yeah, I heard they ripped the whole thing off from some chick and she won huge damages off them.
5) The Matrix sucked!
6) The Matrix sucked!
7) The Matrix sucked!
Then if anyone defended or stood up for the Matrix Trilogy even in the mildest way they would be shouted down by points 5-7. And the major weapon used in this browbeating? The Original Stick.
Well, here’s the thing children, the Matrix may not have been amazingly original in its concept but it was a hell of a lot more original than a plague of sequels, adaptations and remakes. I have no problem with a well executed film of any sort, after all I accept that nothing is original. But if originality really is that important to you then you need to be on a quest a little harder than the one to find the Holy Grail.
Original Stick that up your smug, judgemental arses.
(P.S. Although I think The Matrix fails to deliver in several important respects it is, historically, one of the most important Motion Picture Trilogies ever produced and will be forever more. Give it up. And if Larry Wachowski wants to be a guy with a vagina owned by a celebrity dominatrix that’s his business not ours.)